On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Chuan-kai Lin <chk...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> This causes unrelated packages to break. Please revert this change >> until wheezy is released, since it makes fixing bugs in testing harder >> than necessary for pacakges build-depending on bison. > > Do you happen to know what is the correct procedure to revert the > introduction of a new upstream release? > Is it something that the release team can handle through a bug to > release.debian.org?
No, I don't think the RT can do that. I think there are only 3 options: 1. Ignore this bug (not what I'd like) 2. Upload the old version again with an increased epoch (like 2:2.5.dfsg-1) 3. Upload the old version with a version like 1:2.6.2.dfsg+really2.5-1 I'm not sure if there is a "correct" procedure, I've seen both 2 and 3 done. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
