Hi, intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> writes: > Ansgar Burchardt wrote (24 Oct 2012 09:09:26 GMT) : >> This should already be fixed upstream: >> https://github.com/monsieurvideo/get-flash-videos/commit/95be0e51df6b13dea87fe0d8b1083d98241e11c8 > > Confirmed, pushed the patch in our Git repository for this package. > I won't have time to upload soonish, though. > > BTW, I wonder if we should bump the severity, and get the fix in Wheezy. > Or maybe this rather for wheezy-updates, really. > I'm wondering if it makes sense to ship such a package into a stable > release at all. Did we discuss this already?
There's no difference between maintaining it in stable or -updates: the later is merged at point release times[1]. [1] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/10/msg00002.html> The question is if there is somebody who will prepare the necessary updates and talk to the release team. There are some more packages in the same situation (*marked* packages maintained by pkg-perl): *clive*, cclive, anything else using libquvi: I'm currently preparing updates for clive in squeeze and plan to do so for libquvi-scripts in wheezy. libquvi is the backend for clive, cclive, quvi, nomnom and some other programs in wheezy. *libwww-youtube-download-perl*: Probably broken in wheezy, newer version in unstable. Not part of squeeze. youtube-dl: Not working in wheezy, currently has a removal hint[2]. Not part of squeeze. [2] <http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=youtube-dl> Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org