On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <t...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan > <t...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan >> <t...@debian.org> wrote: >>> So, I agree with splitting the gnome-accessibility-themes binary. >> >> Any progress? If not, I'm proposing another NMU, which: >> - Splits a11y themes into gnome-accessibility-themes binary >> - Splits the shared translation files into gnome-themes-standard-common >> - Makes both theme packages depend on -common >> - Declares gnome-accessibility-themes and gnome-themes-standard-common >> as Replaces: the old gnome-themes-standard >> - Drops Replaces: from gnome-themes-standard >> >> Debdiff is attached. >> >> However, some warnings are found during the upgrade test: >> >> ---8<--- >> Preparing to replace gnome-themes-standard 3.4.2-1 (using >> gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-1.1_amd64.deb) ... >> Unpacking replacement gnome-themes-standard ... >> dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory >> '/usr/share/icons/HighContrast': Directory not empty >> dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory >> '/usr/share/icons/LowContrast': Directory not empty >> dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory >> '/usr/share/icons/HighContrastInverse': Directory not empty >> ---8<--- >> >> The remaining files in these directories are "icon-theme.cache". >> Any suggestion on how to clear them properly? > > It seems this does not happen with clean installs. So, it may not be an issue. > Could I do the NMU, then?
Uploaded to DELAYED/2. Without response for a long time, I assume it's qualified NMU, despite the intrusive change. Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
