On 6 November 2012 08:44, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > So actually, only python-glade2 may be good idea to add to the list.
Ok, that's correct. But please don't close valid bugs just because you don't feel like fixing them today. python-glade2 is definitely not something that is installed on an average Debian system. Since ibus-anthy won't work without python-glade2, I think this bug's importance is easily "Serious" and therefore RC. The original Ubuntu bug was http://pad.lv/829876 >> This is the only diff between Ubuntu and Debian for this package. > > Debian's objective is not match Ubuntu. Please explain this update > benefits current Debian. Your bug report is not so friendly kind to us. > We are not releasing these for Ubuntu. Without assessing merit and > risks, no patch is accepted from Ubuntu. I'm sorry if my bug report seemed rude or unfriendly. It definitely was not intended that way. Having packages in sync makes it easy to verify that Ubuntu didn't fix something in their packages and neglected to forward that fix to Debian (as this bug which was fixed in Ubuntu a year ago). You can use http://packages.qa.debian.org/ibus or http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org to easily check the Ubuntu versions. Also, it is much easier on Ubuntu developers to include the latest fixes from Debian if they can do a sync instead of a merge. Just because you don't care about Ubuntu does not mean that you should refuse contributions from Ubuntu. > Please do not make us spend more time explaining than you thinking and > doing explanation. Actually, it's your job as a Debian maintainer to triage bugs in the packages you maintain. I've reported multiple valid bugs in ibus-related packages today and given the somewhat unfriendly reaction, I'm less motivated to do so in the future. Jeremy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org