On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 20:30 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 05-11-12 12:59, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > >> Next (errors?): > >> invalid Package Link: file > >> "/usr/lib/lazarus/0.9.30.4/components/codetools/codetools.lpk" does not > >> exist. > > These are real bugs, I have a bug open in upstream Mantis BTS and will > > resolve it soon. As I said, .lpk files are not sources but part of LCL > > binary packages. > > Could you please provide the upstream bug number here, I could not > locate it? UpstreamBug#21272: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21272
> > Same as above, will be fixed soon (you may want to create a bug for > > these and refer to upstream bug) > > Or just use this bug for tracking that? We could just retitle this bug > to something about these bugs? Yes, we can retitle it and connect it with upstream bug > > These will not fixed soon due to low priority and freeze. Also A new FPC > > and Lazarus upstream versions are being prepared and I'd not fix those > > bugs before I get the new versions in sid. So I'd expect to have them > > not before a few months. > > Fair enough. OK > >> I can see your point. However, in that case it would be a nice-to-have > >> to avoid the above mentioned errors/warnings. > > I'd prefer to keep them, so a newbe who tried to play with minimizing > > installation can understand that he is missing some installation parts > > and can fix them before concluding that Lazarus is a sheet piece of code. > > The warning is fine, especially because you already said that the others > are valid bugs. So in the end I expect only one warning to remain, right? OK > >> No problem. I don't have problems doing that. Do I read correctly here > >> that you would also not consider packaging lazarus 1.0 in experimental > >> to help Ubuntu have that in their next release? > > I've tarted packaging Lazarus 1.0 in local git branch and eve pushed > > parts to the upstream trunk. Some other fixes are still in my git branch > > and not pushed yet. I'll package Lazarus 1.0 after wheezy, but if you > > are interested, I can create a branch 1.0 on bollin (VCS server for FPC > > and Lazarus Debian packaging) and you can use it for Ubuntu. > > Please do, I will see if I can take it from there than. I'll create a branch and ping you, but this week FPC is publishing 2.6.2rc1 and this takes me too much time. Probably next week should be OK Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
