On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 12:22 +0100, Andreas Glaeser wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:33:26 +0200 > Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:24:27 +0200, Andreas Glaeser wrote: > > > > > This installation went quite fine, but I had the > > > debian-desktop-environment installed on this box and wondered in the > > > end, that it was Gnome3, not XFCE. I thought XFCE was the default now > > > for CD-installations and a single-CD-image was used for this (while > > > > Nope... > > > > > using a network-mirror). Gnome3 began starting up, but with only 256 > > > MB of RAM, this would have been an endless swap-orgy, so Gnome was > > > removed again with tasksel and task-xfce-desktop and task-lxde-desktop > > > chosen instead. As with the IGEL-thinclient before, I built a special > > > kernel-image for this box, because *-686-pae would produce a > > > > Why? The 486 kernel image should work just fine. Which one did d-i > > install? > > > > > reboot-loop instead of starting up and lower latency-times are > > > appreciated. > > > > Cheers, > > Julien > > d-i installed the -486 kernel and you are right, it works just fine. I use the > -3.2-486-bpo kernel now on this box with the otherwise stable release. It > really is OK, > although -686 would be even nicer maybe ? Wikipedia says, TM-Crusoe is a > 586-CPU, so > possibly -686 would not work at all, [...]
Aside from the fact that it wouldn't work, it doesn't exist any more in 'wheezy': http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/upcoming-changes-in-debian-linux-packages-for-i386.html Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
