* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [121108 01:18]: > Therefore > > A 4. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a > A dependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome; this dependency > A should be removed for the release of wheezy. > > B 4. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a > B dependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome; this dependency > B should be removed for the release of wheezy. After the release of > B wheezy, if in the opinion of the NM maintainer the concerns > B raised in ยง4 of the CTTE decision #681834 have been addressed > B through technical means, the meta-gnome maintainers may freely > B adjust the dependencies as usual.
I'm thinking whether it might be helpful to put a reference to the discussion here, like "e.g. by preventing nm to start as discussed in #688772". Also, with my tech ctte member hat on, I don't think I mind to have the technical fixes applied pre-wheezy (however it might be useful to have someone additionally to the nm maintainer in the loop to avoid further misunderstandings, at least pre-wheezy). (I however fear it is too late, so I'm not sure we should put something in about the pre-wheezy.) Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org