convinced that I need to send this through here...

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 16:55 +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Monday 17 October 2005 01:18, the BTS wrote:
> > > > merge 329547 320024
> > >
> > > Bug#320024: fai-cd does not work with sarge
> > > Bug#329547: fai-cd: sources.list should be configurable
> > > Merged 320024 329547.
> > 
> > Aehm, I'm not so sure if this was a good idea: 320024 could be fixed within 
> > sarge, where 329547 maybe not.
> > 
> > (If we only wanted to fix the issues in sid, merging is certainly a good 
> > idea.)
> >
> But properly fixing #320024 certainly demands a solution similar to my
> suggestion, which is #329547. Thus I'd say this merge was not that wrong; but 
> if
> it was, anyone is free to unmerge these bugs. 

Michael, not quite. This is all a bit complex because of the exact
wording that is used in the bugreports:

Fixing 320024 just puts testing instead of stable into the sources list.
But that's not enought to get to a working FAI cd.

Fixing 329547 so the worst symptom is gone, namely, the fai cd cannot
install a system properly, is only taking contrib and non-free out of
line 214 in fai-cd.

This, again, does not fix 329547 as requested in it's title 
"sources.list should be configurable" - sources list won't get any more
configurable by removing main and contrib from line 214.

Possible solutions
extend 320024, so it's clear that there is more broken than just using
testing instead of stable, namely "contrib" and "non-free" in the same
line won't result in a "working" cd for now.
When we fix this, the bad symtom of 329547 is gone. So we set 329547
back to wishlist level and can make it real nice sometime.

I'd like to do the bugfixing and testing and checking in to svn work,
who does the bts stuff? :)


Henning






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to