On Sun 25 Nov 2012 at 17:30:28 +0200, Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote: Hello Sorina.
> For most cases, I think not adding configuration for wireless in > /e/n/i is good, however for the kind a situations you described I > think the best solution would be to have the question asked, at least > with a low priority. If that would be the case, changing the > permissions of /e/n/i to 600 should also be considered. Having the question asked in *all* cases would be far preferable to having something you may not want forced on you. I still do not understand "For most cases . . .". Without a handful of CDs available there is only one way to restore the disallowed connection to a network - ifupdown. Set it up, pull it down, set it up again isn't my idea of what Debian should do. Because the opportunity may not arise again: I have been following the development of wireless connectivity in D-I for the past year. The implementation (from the point of view of whether it works) is very good. I would like to thank you and everybody else for the work which has been done. The quality of the emerging end result is a credit to the Debian Project and shows what can be achieved with Free software and a team of committed developers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org