On 27/11/12 09:28, Julien Cristau wrote: > *sigh* Yeah, I know. I don't think there is a good solution to this, and mass-binNMUing seems like the least awful.
>> Here is a lengthy list of binNMUs. I would like these to be done on all >> architectures [...] those >> packages from this list that are multiarch remain co-installable. >> > Actually, they won't. They'll have different changelogs. I'd hoped that binNMUing for all architectures with the same "commit message" avoided that, but I suppose the timestamp in debian/changelog is what causes the problem? In that case, please hold off on this for now, and I'll spend some more time trying to reduce the list. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org