Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > > It's not the list spine I'm trying to copy, but the string objects
Ah, I see. Yes that might be prudent, though the "flavor-dir" one coming in is a fresh concat. > I suppose one argument for keeping the symlink is the possibility that > Emacs or add-on packages may look for that particular directory by name > (which sounds plausible to me). Sounds likely ... change the policy to match the practice :-). > If we're only going to have one of them load-path, the <flavor> > directory would be the more stable choice -- right now, though, I can't > see how it's being added in the first place. Offhand, I don't see code > for that in either emacsen-common or in emacs24, but perhaps I've missed > it. Hmm. Does "emacs -Q" own startup put all subdirs like /usr/share/emacs/24.2/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el, then debian adds /usr/share/emacs24/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el/ You'd be tempted to prune out the /24.2/ ones if they're merely symlinks to the debian ones. It looks like all the 24.2 is at the same place in the load-path order. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org