Hi, Quoting The Wanderer (2012-12-10 02:25:21) > When I attempt to dist-upgrade to current testing, apt wants to remove > libjack0 and install libjack-jackd2-0. This is fine; the latter > explicitly Provides: the same virtual package as the former, so > presumably this is part of an intended package transition. > > As part of the same dist-upgrade, apt wants to remove libjack-dev, but > does not attempt to install libjack-jackd2-dev. This is not fine. > > Please modify package dependencies so that a dist-upgrade on a system > where libjack-dev is installed will correctly transition to > libjack-jackd2-dev.
No, because this is not a transition, but two different APIs that (mostly) share same ABI. Which means some packages works fine with either of the JACK libraries but some require the jackd2 one - which then pushes the other out, including the -dev package. > Alternately, if this transition would in fact not be correct, please > explain to me what the correct procedure - even if a manual one - > would be. If you want to develop JACK v1 then avoid installing packages that depend on the JACK v2 extensions to the ABI/API. I believe there is no bug here - but am not sure, so please do not give up just yet :-) Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature