Ben Hutchings wrote: > You confirmed that hibernation works and that GNOME is properly > detecting the low battery level, so I don't see how this is a kernel > bug. The decision to hibernate is a matter of userland policy, so I > think you were right with #684186.
I'm not so sure about this since the lowest value I get with 'acpi -b' is 2% and about 00:06:00 seconds remaining. I've tested this again today and I saw those values seconds before my battery drained and my notebook shut down. As mentioned in message #57 of bug #684186 I guess I'm affected by two separate bugs here: g-s-d fails to execute actions on low battery condition and at the same time ACPI reports incorrect battery values – that's the reason why I opened another bugreport. Stefan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
