Package: glabels Version: 3.0.1-2 Severity: normal Tags: upstream glabels cannot use the information in the ADR fields but insists on using LABEL fields, even if they don't exist. Yet, RFC 2426 makes LABEL an optional field that CAN be used to specify an address label, but does not replace or provide an alternative to ADR.
Furthermore, vCard 4.0 drops LABEL altogether. Therefore, please let me use the well-defined information in the ADR fields for a merge. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages glabels depends on: ii dpkg 1.16.9 ii glabels-data 3.0.1-2 ii libc6 2.13-37 ii libcairo2 1.12.2-2 ii libebook-1.2-13 3.4.4-1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.4-2 ii libglib2.0-0 2.34.2-1 ii libgtk-3-0 3.6.1-1 ii libiec16022-0 0.2.4-1 ii libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-1 ii libqrencode3 3.4.1-1 ii librsvg2-2 2.36.1-1 ii libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-7 Versions of packages glabels recommends: pn evince <none> Versions of packages glabels suggests: pn evolution-data-server <none> -- no debconf information -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
