Le mardi 18 décembre 2012 à 21:39 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 15:31:52 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > +diff --git a/gjs/context.h b/gjs/context.h > > +index 4e01cc7..d19d8a5 100644 > > +--- a/gjs/context.h > > ++++ b/gjs/context.h > > +@@ -68,7 +68,11 @@ gboolean gjs_context_define_string_array > > (GjsContext *js_context, > > + GList* gjs_context_get_all (void); > > + void* gjs_context_get_native_context (GjsContext *js_context); > > + > > ++/* initial_frame is a JSStackFrame, but cannot be exposed as such in the > > ++ public API. Pass NULL to get the topmost frame. > > ++*/ > > + void gjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer (GjsContext *js_context, > > ++ void > > *initial_frame, > > + GString *buf); > > + > > + void gjs_context_print_stack_stderr (GjsContext > > *js_context); > > gjs/context.h seems to be a public header, and > gjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer is exported. This looks like ABI > breakage to me?
Yes it is, but I checked rdeps and they don’t use the function except for gjs itself. Maybe I need to add a Breaks, though. (As you may have noticed, upstream is not very careful with gjs’ ABI versioning, grrr) -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org