Am 14.01.2013 12:07, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I agree that debian/copyright is the best place to cover effective licensing, but I disagree that we whould do it before it is defined as the purpose of that file to cover *both* source and effective licensing.
But then, TTBOMK the effective license of a library does not only depend on the licenses of the source files it is composed of. For example, using a LGPL-2+ licensed library in software that is Apache-licensed will turn the effective license of said library to LGPL-3, because LGPL-2 is incompatible. However, I am afraid these are some corner cases that we simply cannot cover in debian/copyright.
- Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
