Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: normal While I write this,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=tetex-bin&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable displays, among others, the following information: Outstanding bugs -- Grave functionality bugs; Unclassified (3 bugs) * #334613: tetex-bin: fmtutil-sys fails during package package setup Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-9); Severity: grave; Reported by: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. * #334701: can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 due to /usr/share/man/man1/texi2pdf.1.gz Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 2.0.2-31); Severity: grave; Reported by: Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. * #334713: tetex-bin: package doesn't install because of missing mfw binary Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-9); Severity: grave; Reported by: Florian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Outstanding bugs -- Serious policy violations; Unclassified (1 bug) * #334005: builds libkpathsea3 which is also built by libkpathsea3 Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 2.0.2-31; fixed: tetex-bin 3.0-9); Severity: serious; Reported by: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Done: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Will be archived in 27 days. The last of the bugs above (#334005) is marked as fixed and "will be archived", but because of this it should *not* be displayed as outstanding, but as "Resolved". The second of these bugs (#334701) has been reported on an unstable system while for this particular system 2.0.2-31 was still available, but at a time where the Debian archive contained the buggy version only in testing, not in unstable (which has 3.0-9). This was somewhen between late Tuesday and early Wednesday. I think this bug should not be displayed on the bugs page for unstable. Furthermore, Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
