Adam C Powell IV wrote: >merge 195509 301898 >thanks > >Just an update: because gfortran and g77 do not produce >symbol-compatible objects (according to mpich configure), mpich refuses >to use gfortran for Fortran 90/95. And because g77-3.4 is still the >recommended compiler for Fortran 77 code, use of Fortran 90/95 is on >hold until gfortran is sufficiently stable to be used for both sets of >code. > >At that point, the change in symbol naming may force us to go through a >nasty Fortran transition like the C++ transition, but not quite as nasty >because there's not quite as much Fortran as C++ in Debian. > >Cheers, >Adam > >On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:57 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > >>reassign 195509 mpich >>retitle 195509 Please support Fortran 90 using new gfortran >>thanks >> >>Hello Konrad, >> >>Thanks for the note on this bug. I'm just now following up on my old >>bugs in my Debian bugs folder. >> >>The bug was originally about mpich's lack of support for fortran 90. >>Now that gfortran-4.0 is in unstable, I'm reassigning it back to mpich >>(which I maintain). >> >>Thanks, >> >> >-Adam > > TRY IT!! https://www.scientificlinux.org/
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
