On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 12:47:47 +0000, Wookey wrote: > +++ Guillem Jover [2012-07-17 05:02 +0200]: > > Before I'll consider including something like this, the aforementioned > > deployment to see if it really covers all your needs would be nice, > > and after that we'd need to propose and discuss this in for example > > debian-devel, because other software will need to be adapted to > > support the new syntax. I'll try to give a more detailed review of > > the code in few days. > > OK. So we've spent 6 months satisfying ourselves that there is no > technical problem with this design, and have started a debian-devel > thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00329.html
Thanks for that! And yes I've seen it, I've just been letting it sink in and sleeping over some of the things said on the thread. > It would be useful if you gave any feedback you have in that thread > before we try to sumarise a final plan. Sure, was planning on finishing some other things first and replying this week. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
