tags 606726 patch thanks On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Timo Kokkonen <t...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> But I would need to know what upstream think of this change ? >> >> Timo, Is this ok that -quiet also remove any left over printf(), esp >> the summary line: >> >> >> foo.jpg 200x200 24bit JFIF [OK] 11884 --> 11279 bytes (5.09%), optimized > > > > Hi, thats fine with me. Please send me the patch and I'll check it in. > > (https://github.com/tjko/jpegoptim) > > -- > Timo <t...@iki.fi>
Attached. Thanks.
quiet_summary.patch
Description: Binary data
