On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:35:21PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> That's not how it works. Unless you actually reproduce a FTBFS on a >> release arch (and without fiddling with options), don't file it as RC. > *sigh* Isn’t that something the maintainer can do?
snappy has already built fine several times on release architectures. I have seen this on GNU/Hurd, but never on any Linux architecture before this report. > I know, you as RT member have even more work to do, but the amount > of effort I put into Debian-Ports is absolutely not neglegible > either. Also, I do not have any fast enough release architecture > hardware to do so reasonably, and porterboxen require too much > roundtrips for B-Ds. FWIW, I will fix this bug -- like I said, there will be a new upload when the upstream release fixing this appears. But I will _not_ try to push this through to wheezy unless the RT says this is something that should be fixed. (We are already late in the freeze, as I understand it.) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
