-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to understand why you are opposed to keeping the soname in the package name. Is it particularly burdensome to do this for some reason?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRInovAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75tCsIAIl3iRNK/CwHzHKSF5aKWH7+ 7Rljym7KrED7D8YXG9OZKkZgQgqZ64eP1OUwwexa+vht0JxTN9YAeKsI6lfHPV5P n5GSWiJpeDEoVj6Vh5wfaOFvPh0Hwi1u+q6azFb1K7iNRLpCv5XCfgPi7n+0HGmD csjSRtzE+VHcbtmbRCTx7qvsXa/v3SGCyzlT/zRbwCCk7E+iFlS224qrIXpZd1et VN21/8jv5wro03nOTW1XljJc85mnFA6hyjGlMvhUjXFqgcRzZgT1gdkdcu7cHev+ Vo+h8QnizKbJALZFD7zgtSZrjpHoL8CY2xEWAC+HLM/f+aaTPjV1UGgZapadye4= =N2Lk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
