Hi Chris,
thanks for your answer. I guess this is sufficient.
Thanks for your work on obo-relations
Andreas.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:07:54AM -0800, Chris Mungall wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas
>
> For the new RO we made the code BSD and the content CC-BY 3.0. The content is
> the part that is required by EMBOSS
>
> http://code.google.com/p/obo-relations/
>
> Is this sufficient for the old OBO_REL (http://obofoundry.org/ro)? Is my
> agreement sufficient? Or do you need a license file embedded somewhere on the
> website (the content is somewhat frozen at the moment, I advise EMBOSS to
> move to the new RO)?
>
> On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:16 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > sorry for pinging again. Could you please issue some sign of live to
> > let us know whether we could hope for some license clarification or
> > whether we might need to seek for other people affiliated to OBO
> > Relation Ontology?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:06:10PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >> I hope you are fine and got my last mail. In case you might need some
> >> time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to
> >> give us some confirmation that you are working on this. Any response
> >> from your side (or somebody else in charge for OBO Relation Ontology)
> >> will be helpful.
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >>
> >> Andreas.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:40:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>> Hi Chris,
> >>>
> >>> I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included
> >>> the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution. The EMBOSS suite
> >>> does contain some files of the OBO Relation Ontology. I failed to find
> >>> any licensing or contact information at
> >>>
> >>> http://obofoundry.org/ro/
> >>>
> >>> but I noticed that you are the maintainer of this page and you might at
> >>> least be able to forward this request. So I hope is fine to contact
> >>> you. Please note that I have put the according bug tracker e-mail to
> >>> this mail which makes this mail publicly available. While we would
> >>> finally need a public statement please make sure you drop this CC in
> >>> case you prefer that your response is not publicly readable.
> >>>
> >>> By packaging the EMBOSS suite the Debian operating system is currently
> >>> redistributing some files from OBO Relation Ontology indirectly, because
> >>> EMBOSS has included these since version 6.4
> >>> (http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/emboss).
> >>>
> >>> Debian considers copyrights and licenses very seriously, and our system
> >>> only contains Free software, that is, materials that our users can
> >>> freely use, modify and redistribute themselves. In addition to our
> >>> system, we have a "non-free" archive in which, as a convenience for our
> >>> users, we redistribute works that give less freedoms to our users.
> >>>
> >>> In order to evaluate if works containing OBO Relation Ontology files can
> >>> at least be distributed in our "non-free" area, I would like to know if
> >>> Pathway ontology is available under other terms of use or licenses, that
> >>> allow redistributing OBO Relation Ontology files. You might even like
> >>> to follow the Gene Ontology Consortium that has put its database under a
> >>> Creative Commons BY (Attribution 3.0 Unported) license[1].
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards and thanks for providing OBO Relation Ontology
> >>>
> >>> Andreas.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GOHELP-147
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://fam-tille.de
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://fam-tille.de
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
