Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > I'm not sure how you've arrived at this conclusion. Have you overlooked > that the shlibs in the ntfs-3g package have been fixed by the maintainer > in unstable (as commented in bug #700677)?
> It still doesn't comply with policy 8.1. But I think that's a policy > bug and that this bug report should be referred over to the policy > package; I don't see anything further here that needs the technical > committee's involvement. You're comfortable with creating a situation where those two packages must always be upgraded in lockstep and there's no way to retain the old version of the ntfs-3g shared library on disk to allow for partial upgrades? Policy doesn't like this configuration for (IMO) sound reasons. It may be fine as a special exception in this case, but I'm not really seeing why we would want to generally relax Policy here. But we can discuss this over on the Policy list, I suppose. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
