> So, for the moment (Wheezy) I think the best approach to solve this bug > is to apply the small patch for OpenLDAP that I'm attaching. > It is the less intrusive approach to fix this bug. It don't needs to > touch anything on GnuTLS or libgcrypt. It is really fixing the problem > where is: OpenLDAP is not setting DISABLE_SECMEM when initializing > libgcrypt.
So, is there a reason not to go with Carlos' patch for openldap? Cheers, Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
