Hi, On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:58:32PM -0800, Christoph Egger wrote: > intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> writes: > > Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) : > >>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the > >>> > whole new release? > > > >> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs > >> in 4.01? > > > > As I understand it (and not being a member of the release team), it > > differs because that one has been reported in Debian as the #685356 > > important bug, while the others have not. At this time of the freeze, > > including a new upstream release because it fixes a lot of more or > > less important bugs (and adds a few features..) is probably not an > > option. I guess that's exactly why Salvatore prepared a minimal > > t-p-u debdiff. > > > > But well, if you feel like every change in 4.01 satisfies the current > > freeze policy and should be fixed in Wheezy, then please feel free to > > explain why :) > > > >> Anyway, we can surely do a Wheezy version of 4.00 that fixes XFS. > > > > OK. Do you ACK Salvatore's proposed t-p-u debdiff? > > Hm could we maybe add 8b6ce13e1b196cb9d0cc5b24dfc75c97a9eb883d (upstream > git) as well? > Seems to be the one addressing (at least the second half of) > #698864. Cc-ed the folks there to check the fixed quota 4.00 binary they > deployed is actually using this patch.
Yes, that's exactly the patch we're using. It fixes our problems described in #698864. Regards Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org