On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 04:42:04PM +0000, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 00:21:29 +0000 > Ryan Kuester <rkues...@insymbols.com> wrote: > > > The attached patch causes such packages to be so marked if > > 'markauto' is set to true in the general settings stanza of the > > configuration file, e.g.: > > Interesting patch, I think there are problems though.
Neil, I see you've marked this bug as pending. Thanks for fixing my patch up. I applologize this didn't get back to the top of my TODO list quickly enough. The logical errors you mentioned were oversights, and the new trim function and other oddities were just my naïveté with perl. You've faithfully implemented the intent of my prototype. I've just given your version from Subversion a spin here, and it works great. > Have you tested this support cross-architecture? Does apt-mark > correctly handle the config_str to prevent pollution of the system > running multistrap? (Please describe if you've > checked /var/lib/apt/extended_states before and after inside the new > chroot and outside it, especially when the chroot is armel on an x86 > system etc.) Yep, that's the mode in which I usually use it--building filesystems for armel on amd64. Thanks again for the useful tool, -- Ryan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
