On 03/04/13 19:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Mike,

Do I understand you correctly that you say that the problem goes away
with installation of libjs-jquery-cookie and libjs-jquery? Than I think
you did not understand the original bug properly. Indeed
libjs-jquery-cookie and libjs-jquery are needed to use the javascript
functionality to fold the tree, but without them you have the html
equivalent tree (which you can't fold).

When I installed the new package, I ended up with a non-functional tree. Installing libjs-jquery and libjs-jquery-cookie "solved" my issue, by making the javascript foldable tree work.

If the answer is "yes" than the bug is still closed. If the answer is
"no, even with libjs-jquery-cookie and libjs-jquery the grouping does
not work" than the bug should be reopened, but I then request a
screen-shot of how it goes wrong and if possible you can tell me how to
create a tree that fails.

With libjs-jquery-cookie and libjs-jquery installed, the tree works. Without them installed, I get a non-working html tree - although I can see in the source that the links are there, clicking on the tree elements does not switch the main frame to display the correct graphs. I tested this in Firefox and Chrome to make sure it wasn't just a browser issue.

Regarding the depends vs recommends, I really think the
libjs-jquery-cookie and libjs-jquery should be "recommends". Recommended
packages are installed by default in Debian since Squeeze.

If it's intended to provide a working HTML tree without the js libs, I completely agree, "recommends" is just fine. My take on this was based on the fact that I ended up with a non functional install after the upgrade, and the javascript libs fixed my immediate problem.

Mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to