Le Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:28:41AM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > > Lintian is "wrong", because it still says that build-* are only > recommeneded. This is bug #657390. > > Policy is also "wrong" because it doesn't include build-* in the > list of required targets, despite that they are described as > required in other place.
Thank you Philipp for your bug report and Jakub for your analysis. Indeed, it looks like an omission in the patch closing #374029. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dbnpolicy/policy.git;a=blobdiff;f=policy.sgml;h=229a8cc7e99996ecbc9f9958c6dfb4557b004822;hp=8c654d1b3b85a8da40369414278f3e359a06c6f0;hb=af73c2257019136ee0ce9180aebe6eb8be0dd76e;hpb=703e8e4101ed3f8c4c345d05b7ac730b6ff46c50 Would people be satisifed of the following change as a non-normative correction, given that the build-arch and build-indep are already marked required by the commit above ? The following targets are required and must be implemented by <file>debian/rules</file>: <tt>clean</tt>, <tt>binary</tt>, - <tt>binary-arch</tt>, <tt>binary-indep</tt>, and <tt>build</tt>. + <tt>binary-arch</tt>, <tt>binary-indep</tt>, <tt>build</tt>, + <tt>build-arch</tt> and <tt>build-indep</tt>. These are the targets called by <prgn>dpkg-buildpackage</prgn>. PS: The autobuilder are still calling 'build' not 'build-arch', don't they ? Have a nice day -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org