On Tue Apr 09 18:00, Thomas Koch wrote: > Niels Thykier: > > I am planning on a rewrite of jh_makepkg and have therefore not > > applied your patch as-is. > > I wasn't aware (forgot) about jh_makepkg and just had a look at it. I don't > think we should have 2 dh-make-* style programs in the java team: jh_makepkg > and mh_make. It's already enough logic duplication between dh-make, dh-make- > perl, dh-make-php, dh-make-drupal, gem2deb, python-stdeb, haskell-devscripts,
Well, mh_make just does maven packages, whereas jh_makepkg (was intended) to cover all the common options. Perhaps they should be merged, but that's up to the mh folks. Only having mh_make would be sad, I think. Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
