On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 20:42 +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote: > This in fact a problem with courier-ssl, already reported. Presumably > it is caused by libssl0.9.7 / libssl0.9.8 transition. > > Bye > Racke
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 15:41 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Yes, this error has been reported against several other packages already, > and appears to be a regression in libssl0.9.8. Apologies for not catching > this before it reached testing. There were so many related changes in yesterday's update of testing it was hard to know where to start with thinking about the problem! It is good in a sense that other packages have the problem so it is clearly the libssl upgrade that is at the heart of it. It means that there may be nothing at all wrong with Courier. A lot of people use Testing far fewer use Unstable so some things will only get caught on the move to Testing -- that's why it is Testing! However, I do have to admit that this one is rather surprising not to have been caught in Unstable. Hopefully the libssl people will find the problem quickly. At least they know it is in the 0.9.7 -> 0.9.8 change. Thanks for the prompt responses. This is much appreciated. And thanks for all your efforts on making Debian so easy to work with. -- Russel. ==================================================== Dr Russel Winder +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
