On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:58:03AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I think configuration files should also be included in the first list, 
> > because the
> > user is supposed to be able to interact dirrectly with them.
> 
> I object to this extension of the proposal, because use of UTF-8
> characters in conffile names is a current use case of ca-certificates.
> If anything it could be treated as a "should" and turned into "must"
> after working with the ca-certificates maintainers on a solution.

Why files in ca-certificates are configuration files in the first place ?
I doubt users are expected to edit PEM certificate.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to