On 04/21/2013 01:32 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On ven., 2013-04-19 at 09:04 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
On 04/17/2013 11:16 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On jeu., 2013-04-04 at 07:40 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hey,

it seems that there's an upstream fix for this at
https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/7252 /
https://trac.gajim.org/changeset/1d8caae49a31

all those commits are needed to fix this issue:

http://hg.gajim.org/gajim/rev/1d8caae49a31
http://hg.gajim.org/gajim/rev/6ab8ea2313aa
http://hg.gajim.org/gajim/rev/d34a996f87b8
http://hg.gajim.org/gajim/rev/35a555c4a107

Thanks. Is the attached NMU ok for you? Moritz, what was the reason for
the severity downgrade? Shouldn't we push this to Squeeze&  Wheezy?

I don't know against what it applies, but not against the one in debian unstable. The first commit I listed seems to be already in your package. But except from that, that seems good.

I've not tested against squeeze 0.15 package though.

--
Yann


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to