On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:23:04AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> Hi Bill and Debian Developers, >> >> My proposal is: >> A. Add libjpeg-turbo to Debian archive (that's easy) >> B. Add required provides/alternatives for libjpeg62-dev and >> libjpeg8-dev (where API/ABI match) >> C. Decide which package should provide default libjpeg-dev library >> >> 1. >> https://bitbucket.org/libgd/gd-libgd/issue/50/tests-jpeg-jpeg_readc-fails-on-debian >> 2. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176299.html >> 3. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602034 > > As IJG libjpeg maintainer, my plan is to move to libjpeg9 which has more > feature. >
>From a user's prospective, I don't think adding bunches of not widely used features is that useful (I mean it's useful but not that important), but speed does matter a lot, especially on slower hardware like ARM-boards. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
