On Mon, 6 May 2013, NeilBrown wrote: > It appears that your '2' partitions are at an offset of a multiple of 64K
Well of course they are ☺ > Both sda and sda2 look like they have the same superblock, because the > superblock is at the "end" of both. This can seriously confuse mdadm. It > would probably refuse to assemble the array unless you have a DEVICES line in > mdadm to tell it to ignore 'sda' etc. .oO(eh?) > If possible, I would suggest recreating the md1 array using 1.2 metadata. But I specifically made it to use 0.90 metadata and the FDh partition type so that Linux will auto-assemble them so that I can boot from them. The mdadm docs say 1.x will not be auto-assembled. I can’t recreate md1 on any of the affected devices (five by now) even should my above concern about booting be a non-issue… bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Sebastian Mancke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org