Package: lintian Version: 2.5.12 Severity: normal Control: block -1 by 699059
Started at [1], but seeing as I haven't had time to deal with it yet I fear it might "disappear" in the depths of my mailbox. I have tried to summarize the current state from the debate on the list, which I believe to be: P python(3)-depends-but-no-python(3)-helper u package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files - has false-positives on "pkg [linux-any]" dependencies. d package-contains-broken-symlink - Suggested that we keep it until #699059 is fixed. u duplicate-files - suggested pedantic/wild-guess (NB: partly done, I think) - avoid triggering on doxygen stuff (or small files in usr/share/doc) u embedded-pear-module - need talk with php/pear maintainers to confirm/improve accuracy and expanding the detection list. ? shlib-calls-exit - There was some disagreement here, but it seems to have ended in favor of keeping the tag. Possibly with whitelisting some known cases, e.g. Apache modules? Legend: p, P -> "Promote(d) to non-experimental as-is" d, D -> "Drop(ped) the tag" u, U -> "Update(d) the tag and then promote/re-evaluate" ? -> "Needs more info" (Upper case means it has already been done. i.e. P is "already promoted", where as p is "intend to promote as-is"). ~Niels [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2013/04/msg00051.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org