Le 2013-05-20 17:14, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as discussed on IRC: Support for actually displaying the buildd status
on developer.php.
There are up to two lines, one for unstable and one (possibly) for
experiemntal). If the package is in good shape on all arches
(Installed
or Not-For-Us), a summary is displayed, otherwise all arches are
shown.
Pabs suggested to sum up the individual states, but I prefer it this
way, as it allows to spot with one glance what arches are affected,
and
if one arch is doing particularly bad.
Cronjob script untested, the rest can be seen in action on
http://qa.debian.org/~nomeata/developer.php?login=nomeata
I can see the need for such view, but somehow, it also makes it less
clear than the old version... since sid and exp look the same. Also, it
is
not true that "exp is always the same" since you could have a package
in
exp, and not in sid. So it makes it mandatory to look at the pointed
url
to understand the meaning.
IMHO, it would be "nicer" if buildd links could be colored when some
package
is failing to build on some arch. It would still be visually clear
which
suite is impacted, and adds the information about the buildd state.
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
