Hi, On 05/21/2013 10:58 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> a precondition for rebuilding ghostscript w/ libtiff5-dev is rebuilding >> cups w/ libtiff5-dev since libcupsimage2-dev also depends on it. > > Why is libtiff-dev not provided by libtiff5-dev ? cups build-depends on > libtiff-dev and I'm surprised to have to change cups's source when we > explicitely depend on the non-versionned -dev package. > > If there's a libtiff transition happening, the libtiff-dev should be provided > by libtiff5-dev (and not by libtiff4-dev anymore) (and cups would be just > binNMU'ed). > > What am I missing here?
You are not missing anything. :-) Since other packages are migrating to libtiff5-dev also, maybe it's time for libtiff-dev to be provided by the newer tiff? Jay, can you please clarify this? Thanks in advance, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
