Hi all, It is not a problem for me to remove the optional invariant sections clause. Next month I am going to release a new version of Numdiff with this change. Would it help if I switched from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3 or later? Kind regards,
Ivano Primi >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: paolo.gre...@libpf.com >Data: 23/05/2013 19.48 >A: "Bastien ROUCARIÈS"<bastien.roucar...@u-cergy.fr>, <709492@bugs.debian. org>, "ivpr...@libero.it"<ivpr...@libero.it> >Ogg: Re: Bug#709492: Numdiff doc is non free > >Hi there, it turned out the GFDL is incompatible with debian policies, >see here: >http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 > >Would it be possible to switch the numdiff docs to a different license >such as the GNU General Public License ? Or at least to not include the >optional invariant sections clause ? > >Otherwise we may be forced to remove those parts from the debian package ... > >TIA > >Paolo > >On 23/05/2013 17:54, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Package: src:numdiff >> Severity: serious >> user: debian...@lists.debian.org >> usertags: gfdl-invariant >> severity: serious >> >> At least : >> docs/numdiff.html >> docs/numdiff.info >> docs/numdiff.txi >> docs/numdiff.txt >> are under the gfdl with invariant section and thus non free. >> >> Please repackage, or ask upstream to relicence >> > > >-- >====================== > Paolo Greppi > +39 320 8960642 >paolo.gre...@libpf.com > http://www.libpf.com >====================== > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
