Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes:
> In the tag description or the tag "extra"? For the former, the problem
> might be that the list is (or could be) architecture dependent. For the
> latter, it would need some changes to hardening-info{,-helper} +
> c/binaries. But also some consideration to handle 5+ unprotected
> functions. Example even the following is getting rather lengthy
> ... hardening-no-fortity-functions path/to/file func1, func2, func3, ...
I was thinking the tag extra, just to list the unprotected functions, but
it was more a matter of curiosity than anything I think is horribly
important.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
