Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> writes: > There’s something else about Built-Using:
> Are those source packages (that would not otherwise be kept in the > archive) released along with “stable”, despite having no binary > packages? Yes, I believe that's how the implementation works. > If not… well, since snapshot.d.o is an official service now, I’d say, > point there for the “legal” side, and only require Built-Using to be > used for the cases where it’s desireable to have this information > present more explicitly, that is, the original toolchain and embedding > stuff, possibly static linking and Haskell. Pragmatic but probably > doable, and since quite some time, sbuild records (in the build log) the > versions of the toolchain packages installed already anyway, so we just > need to put build logs into the snapshots archive as well; I believe > they’re deleted when an architecture moves off the main archive (to > d-ports, or because it’s no longer even in oldstable) normally. Hm, that's an interesting point, indeed. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
