On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:23:36 Ralf Treinen wrote: > Version: libucommon5-dbg/5.2.2-4 > Version: libucommon6-dbg/6.0.4-1
Jonas, Could I suggest that do not version the -dbg package. Whilst there is a use to have the library package versioned, there is little to be gained by versioning the -dbg package, and it does lead to ongoing conflicts like this one. Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
