Hi, On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 15:06 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 04/06/13 14:16, Michele Cane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 13:41 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> On 04/06/13 13:16, Michele Cane wrote: > >>>> sudo aptitude dist-upgrade > >>> > >>> The following NEW packages will be installed: > >>> libharfbuzz0a{ab} > >>> The following packages will be upgraded: > >>> libpango-1.0-0 libpango1.0-0 libpangocairo-1.0-0 libpangoft2-1.0-0 > >>> libpangoxft-1.0-0 > >>> 5 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > >>> Need to get 1,362 kB of archives. After unpacking 689 kB will be used. > >>> The following packages have unmet dependencies: > >>> libharfbuzz0a : Breaks: libharfbuzz0 but 0.9.17-4 is installed. > >> > >> Right there is the problem. libharfbuzz0a breaks/replaces (and rightfully > >> does > >> so) libharfbuzz0. That should be fine, aptitude should resolve to uninstall > >> libharfbuzz0. Do you have something installed that depends on libharfbuzz0 > >> other > >> than pango? What happens if you say No to aptitude's proposed solution? > >> Does it > >> offer another option that is satisfiable (i.e. that will remove > >> libharfbuzz0 but > >> not half of your system). Keep saying No until aptitude finds the right > >> solution. > >> > > > > All the options proposed by aptitude are the one that I posted in my > > previous mail and non of the is satisfactory. > > Probably is due to the gnome packages that I have installed from > > experimental. > > Could be. Try > > aptitude remove libharfbuzz0 > > and paste the output. That should tell us what is holding it back.
I Installed libwebkitgtk-3.0-0 from experimental and fixed the problem. Thank you for the help. Cheers Mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part