I think dcraw did all the original research and he does not want to make it a library because he believes an executable to call is the unix way and a library he could boy change so flexible. This is why I embedded the not too big code to make it a simple built in library inside exact image.
Sent on the go - http://ExactCODE.com Germany. On 09.06.2013, at 18:55, Sven Eckelmann <s...@narfation.org> wrote: > forwarded 711774 exact-im...@exactcode.de > thanks > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:18:04PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> exactimage uses convenient copy of dcraw, instead of relying on libs (eg. >> libraw). Could that be changed ? > > I haven't checked it in detail but libraw is not the same as the included > modified version of dcraw [1]. I will not start to cripple exactimage in > Debian > by ripping out this part of the code but I will try to get in contact with > upstream to find a way in getting a possible migration path to libraw to avoid > too many differences between upstream and Debian version. > >> See: §4.13 Convenience copies ofcode >> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-embeddedfiles > > Btw. did anyone actually try to tell the dcraw guys to switch to libraw? > > Kind regards, > Sven > > [1] > http://rene.rebe.de/2008-11-04/exactimage-065-updates-still-camera-raw-support/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > li...@exactcode.de with a subject of: unsubscribe exact-image -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
