On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:10:12AM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > On Saturday 29 October 2005 10:06, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Package: ara > > Version: 1.0.10 > > Severity: important > > > > Automatic build of ara_1.0.10 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 69 > > [...] > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev, > > ocaml-best-compilers, m4 [...] > > touch build-indep-stamp > > touch build-stamp > > /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch > > touch build-stamp > > dh_testdir > > dh_testroot > > dh_clean -k > > dh_installdirs > > mkdir -p /build/buildd/ara-1.0.10/debian/tmp > > if [ -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt -o -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt.opt ]; then \ > > /usr/bin/make install DESTDIR=/build/buildd/ara-1.0.10/debian/tmp ; \ > > fi > > # The arch-dependent packages are only available on archs supported by > > ocamlopt There are no native code compilers on arch m68k so this package > > arch-dependant part should not build on it. dpkg-genchanges -B > > -mDebian/m68k Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg-genchanges: > > arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages > > dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or > > directory > > Well, we end up needing dpkg-genchanges and dpkg-buildpackage with support > for > building only architecture-independant parts of the package and not > architecture-dependent ones (see #109794 #200454).
There is already infrastructure for binary-arch and binary-indep available, as well as two set of build-deps, the normal ones and the indep ones. > > If this package is not supposed to be built on m68k, please say so in your > > control file and/or stop the build right at the beginning. Christian, this is a fuckup of the buildd's i think, which try to build stuff even if not marked for them. Not sure i haven't locked at this recently. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
