On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 11:15:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 29, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (note the test for $ACTION - this is why I didn't bother specifying it > > in the udev rule.) > Yes, but if you test it in the rule you save a fork+exec if it does not > match. Ah, OK. You phrased it as being more of a requirement than a performance > Or else you can just install a 2.6.15 kernel which supports > /dev/bus/usb/ and does not need a script. Presumably I would still need a script in order to propagate things into procfs until user space knows about the new /dev directory? -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
