Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: > Wakko Warner <wa...@animx.eu.org> writes: > > > Thanks, however I sent another patch that replaced the previous patch. > > The latest one was complete with all the changes including the html. > > You sent two patches, named munin-2.1.diff, and munin-2.1.1.diff. I took > the "2.1.1" patch, assuming the number is a version number of the patch, > and that a higher version number is better. Were my assumtions correct?
Sorry for the confusion. I placed the version of munin in the name of the patch. The first time, I left off the revision of the 2.1.x, second time I didn't. Just didn't remember about which way I did it before. Could have been the excitement of completing it =) > As seen on the URI I sent, > http://munin-monitoring.org/changeset/d2e28ce6f65cb43b95cd98632864e2ed6fde963b/munin-dev/, > the "munin-2.1.1.diff" contains changes in the following source files: > > * _bin/munin-cgi-graph.in (4 diffs) > * lib/Munin/Master/GraphOld.pm (17 diffs) > * lib/Munin/Master/HTMLConfig.pm (3 diffs) > * static/dynazoom.html (5 diffs) > * static/dynazoom.js > * static/querystring.js (1 diff) > > Just to avoid further confusion, and to be explicit, is this > (munin-2.1.1.diff) the patch you want us to use? This is the correct one. -- Microsoft has beaten Volkswagen's world record. Volkswagen only created 22 million bugs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
