Control: tag -1 wontfix Hi,
FYI, issues/requests related to backports should be sent to the debian-backports mailing list (or directly to the maintainer/team in charge of the package), not to the BTS [1]. I personally don't mind either way, but you may find that some maintainers are not so receptive to bugs reported to the BTS against versions not officially in Debian (be it backports, or derivatives like Ubuntu, etc.). On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:06 AM, <francesco.dev...@mailoo.org> wrote: > Package: 0ad > Version: 0.0.13-2+b1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > 0ad is still in early development, please consider adding newer versions of > the > game in wheezy-backports. I've already had another Debian user request an 0ad backport (see [2]), and my response is still the same. The fact that 0ad is still in early development is also partly why I do not wish to backport it right now. However, if 0ad's "1.0" release ever gets released in wheezy's lifetime, then I will definitely consider backporting 0ad to wheezy-backports. As mentioned in #689926, if you're willing to do the work yourself and maintain a 0ad backport in wheezy, that's fine by me. :) Regards, Vincent [1] http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689926#17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org