Hi Osamu, systemd is installed but I didn't do any special setting for it. I am not sure what is the problem you are facing with systemd and gnome-shell 3.8.
For ibus-anthy, I found some issues. If the experimental version of ibus-anthy is installed, I cannot activate it at all. I have added "Japanese" as an input source from gnome 3.8 "region & language settings". But even I choose manually "ja", ibus-anthy is still not activated. By contrast, if I install the sid version of ibus-anthy, this Japanese input method is always activated in all applications. I found ibus-googlepinyin from sid has the same issue. I wonder if there is any special setting needed for gnome 3.8? Thanks, Hongzheng On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:09:43PM -0700, Hongzheng Wang wrote: >> Hi Osamu, >> >> We may be seeing different issues ... > > Maybe ... > >> I am running gnome-shell 3.8 from experimental. > > So you are doing better than me. 3.4 here. No systemd yet. > >> After installing ibus-1.5.2-2, I found ibus cannot start. > > I updated to 1.5.2-4 which has all the upstream patches included. > >> Error messages show kind of connection refuses (when I try to start >> the daemon manually). I checked and found it is due to libibus-1.0-0 >> is installed (required by ibus-pinyin). So, I wonder if the new ibus >> needs to be conflict against that. > > I think I fail since I am not yet using 3.8. Can you point me to a > document which tells us to set up gnome-shell 3.8 and systemd? > > You did better and are hitting the real bug. So package seems better > than I thought it may be. > >> Sorry for the confusion. > > Problem may be old ibus-pinyin in sid is not compatible with ibus 1.5. > There is ibus-pinyin 1.5.0 which needs to be packaged. > > Do you observe the same problem with experimental ibus-anthy? > > Regards, > > Osamu > ==== > > Few issues I observed: > > There seems to exist 2 ABI now: 1.4 and 1.5. Somehow library package name > always 1.0-0 now jumped to 1.0-5 matching libibus-1.0.so.0 and > libibus-1.0.so.5. Quite confusing. > > Normal libraries do not cause even if we install many versions. So I > removed "Replaces: libibus-1.0-0". > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org