On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:07:28PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > >> That would be 100+ Breaks. I do not think that is feasible but that may > >> need a wider discussion. > > > > How did you reach that conclusion? I looked at the current testing > > distribution, and the only direct dependency on apache2.2-common is > > libapache2-svn, which may go away when subversion is able to > > transition to testing. > > It's one now. :) > > It was the state as of Squeeze at the time I wrote this as we were in > the middle of the transition. Now we can seriously consider doing the > transition package approach.
Ah ;-) > > So it seems like having a dependency on a dummy apache2.2-common would > > be the sensible (if annoying) thing to do. > > Thanks for this list. I'm short of time for the next 2-4 weeks, and > unless sf beats me with it I will address all the outstanding Apache > packaging issues then (or try to find a feasible solution at least). Pleasure! It will help others not suffer the (minor) losses which I had, which might be more major for them (I was on a non-server machine which only used apache for local use). Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org